The Supreme Court has repeatedly observed that limitation periods are important for maintaining certainty and discipline in legal proceedings. However, at the same time, the Court has also held that genuine and reasonable delay should not always defeat substantial justice.
In many cases, appeals are filed after delay due to illness, financial difficulty, lack of legal knowledge, or procedural complications. In such situations, the Courts examine whether the delay was bona fide and properly explained.
The Supreme Court has clarified that delay cannot be condoned in a routine or casual manner. At the same time, a genuine litigant should not suffer merely because of minor procedural delay if the case otherwise deserves consideration.
The conduct of the party, the explanation offered, and the overall interest of justice play an important role while deciding delay condonation applications.
In simple words, delay may be condoned where there is good faith and reasonable explanation, but negligence, inaction, or casual approach may result in dismissal of the appeal.
Therefore, litigants should always act promptly and seek legal advice without unnecessary delay.
