In practice, many Supreme Court petitions suffer not because the case is weak, but because the drafting is not proper or effective.
One common mistake is unnecessary long facts. Instead of stating clear and relevant facts, petitions often become lengthy and confusing. The Court prefers short and focused facts.
Another issue is lack of clear question of law. Many petitions fail to show what exactly is the legal issue which requires consideration by the Supreme Court.
There is also a tendency to repeat the same arguments taken before lower courts. The Supreme Court expects a different approach, focusing on legal error or serious injustice.
Many times, grounds are vague and general. Grounds should be specific, legally sound, and directly connected to the issue.
Another mistake is poor structuring. If the petition is not properly arranged, it becomes difficult for the Court to understand the matter quickly.
Lastly, insufficient attention is given to the overall presentation and clarity. A well-drafted petition should be simple, clear, and to the point.
In short, good drafting is not about length, but about clarity, precision, and proper focus.
Ravindra Nath Pareek (R.N.PAREEK)
Advocate
